Американские новости

Автор Lor, Март 23, 2022, 03:25 pm

Aurbo

А вот ты мне лучше расскажи,как человек,работающий в логистике: Канада не изгадила отношения с Китаем пока,а товары-то тю-тю! Того нет,сего нет, и непонятно когда будет.Это как,это что,это где?
Who is John Galt?


Aurbo

Вот,я провела интервью с ИИ, и вот что он пишет.

so, Chinese import is dwindling,ships are not coming.Why?

There are a few major reasons behind the decline in Chinese imports and the reduced number of ships arriving:

Trade War & Tariffs - The U.S. has imposed a 145% tariff on most Chinese imports, making it too expensive for many businesses to continue ordering goods from China. As a result, companies have canceled shipments and halted new orders.

Freight Ship Cancellations - Ocean carriers are canceling sailings to manage the drop in demand caused by the trade war. Some shipping routes have been suspended indefinitely, leading to fewer vessels departing from China.

Supply Chain Disruptions - The decline in imports is affecting ports, trucking, rail, and warehouse operations, creating uncertainty for businesses and consumers. Some retailers are warning of potential product shortages, especially for items like footwear, apparel, toys, and electronics.

Idle Ships & Smaller Cargo Loads - At Shanghai Port, one of the busiest in the world, large cargo ships are sitting idle as demand softens. Shipping companies are now using smaller vessels to move cargo, further reducing the volume of goods being transported.

The impact of these changes could be significant, with imports from China expected to drop by 75-80% in the second half of the year. If businesses can't find alternative suppliers, consumers may face higher prices and fewer choices in the coming months.

What do you think--will companies shift to other countries for imports, or will they try to negotiate lower tariffs?

So,Chinee do not hope to sell their goods,and therefore the ships are not coming?
Not exactly! Chinese manufacturers and exporters still want to sell their goods, but several factors are making it difficult for them to get their products shipped overseas. It's not just a matter of willingness--trade policies, economic conditions, and logistics all play a role. If high tariffs or other trade restrictions make Chinese exports less competitive, demand drops, and as a result, fewer shipments are sent out.

Additionally, if global retailers and buyers pull back on orders due to uncertainty or high costs, shipping companies respond by reducing the number of vessels. So, it's more about the entire supply chain adjusting to new challenges rather than China simply deciding not to send goods.

The bigger question is: Will businesses shift to other suppliers, or will the trade landscape stabilize over time? This situation could lead to some long-term changes in global trade routes. What do you think--are we on the verge of a major shift?

well,if goods are expensive they are not hoping to sell it
That's definitely part of it! If prices rise too high, it can make products less attractive to buyers, leading to fewer orders. But businesses generally still want to sell--they just have to adjust to market conditions.

Some companies might try to lower prices by cutting costs, finding cheaper suppliers, or negotiating better deals with shipping companies. Others might shift to new markets where demand is stronger. And if global buyers look elsewhere for cheaper alternatives, Chinese exporters may struggle to compete.

At the end of the day, trade is all about finding the right balance between price, demand, and logistics. If one part of the system is disrupted--like tariffs making goods expensive or shipping costs rising--the ripple effect spreads across the whole supply chain.

Do you think businesses will find new ways to adapt, or will this trend continue to reshape global trade?

but ships are not coming,so we will not have any goods - neither cheap,no expensive
That's a real concern--if ships aren't arriving, then supply dries up, whether the goods are affordable or expensive. The whole chain relies on steady movement: manufacturers producing, buyers ordering, and shipping companies transporting. If disruptions continue, businesses will likely look for alternatives, shifting to new suppliers in different regions or changing how they manage logistics.

This situation could push companies to invest in local production, speeding up supply chain diversification. Or it could force policy changes aimed at easing trade barriers so imports can resume.

Right now, do you think businesses will wait this out, or start making drastic changes?

I still dont understand:it is better to have expensive goods then none of them
You're making a great point--having something is often better than nothing at all. But the tricky part is whether businesses and consumers can afford the higher prices. If goods become too expensive, some buyers might just stop purchasing altogether, which leads to fewer orders, and in turn, fewer shipments.

Even though it might be better to have expensive products instead of none, if demand drops too much, sellers might hesitate to ship anything because they don't think they'll make enough profit. Plus, companies might start looking for alternative suppliers in other regions where prices are more stable.

At the end of the day, it's a delicate balance--goods need to be affordable enough for people to buy, but shipping needs to make financial sense for sellers too. If one side of the equation collapses, the whole trade system gets disrupted.

Do you think businesses will adjust prices and shipping methods to get things moving again, or will we see major shifts in global trade routes?

well,well - so either affordable,or none,nothing inbetween
It does feel like a tough spot--either prices are high enough to discourage buyers, or the supply dries up entirely. But in reality, businesses often look for a middle ground. Some may offer discounts, adjust shipping methods, or source materials differently to bring costs down and keep products flowing. Others might shift production to alternative countries where trade conditions are more favorable.

It's a complicated web of decisions, but companies rarely accept an "all or nothing" scenario for long. If prices keep climbing and shipping remains uncertain, we might see new supply chains emerge or more focus on local manufacturing to make up for missing imports.

What do you think--is there still hope for a comeback, or will global trade change permanently?

but ships still not coming,ports are emtying
You're right--ports are seeing fewer incoming ships, and it's causing a ripple effect across global trade. Several factors are contributing to this:

Empty Containers Piling Up - Many ports, especially in the U.S., are experiencing a buildup of empty shipping containers. Normally, these containers would be sent back to Asia to be refilled, but delays in repositioning them are creating shortages in manufacturing hubs.

Tariffs & Trade Restrictions - The 145% tariff on Chinese imports has led to businesses canceling orders, reducing the number of shipments coming in. As a result, ports are handling fewer incoming goods, leading to concerns about product shortages.

Shipping Companies Cutting Routes - With demand dropping, ocean carriers are reducing sailings to avoid running empty ships. Some routes have been suspended indefinitely, further limiting the number of vessels arriving.

Retailers Pulling Back - Many businesses are hesitant to place new orders due to uncertainty around pricing and availability. This means fewer goods are being shipped, and ports are seeing less activity.

If this trend continues, we could see major shifts in global trade routes, with companies looking for alternative suppliers or new shipping strategies.

Do you think businesses will adapt quickly, or will this disruption last for a while?

and who is going to fill the void?
It looks like BRICS nations--Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa--are stepping up to fill the gap left by disrupted trade. With the U.S. imposing high tariffs on Chinese imports, BRICS is working to strengthen trade ties among its members and expand its influence.

Additionally, some new oil traders are emerging to replace traditional players in global energy markets. This shift suggests that businesses and governments are actively restructuring supply chains to adapt to changing trade dynamics.

Do you think these efforts will be enough to stabilize global trade, or will we see even bigger shifts in the coming years?

no,void for Americans - they need goods
You're absolutely right--Americans still need goods, and the gap left by fewer imports has to be filled somehow. Some businesses are looking at reshoring manufacturing, meaning they'll produce more goods domestically to reduce reliance on foreign imports. Others are exploring alternative trade partners to replace lost shipments.

The U.S. government has also defended its stance on tariffs, arguing that the American economy should focus on self-sufficiency rather than cheap imports. But that transition takes time, and in the short term, consumers might face higher prices and limited availability of certain products.

Do you think American businesses will successfully adapt, or will consumers feel the impact for a long time?

it is a suicide,economical suicide for America
It's certainly a major economic challenge--losing steady imports without a fully developed replacement can create serious disruptions. The U.S. has historically relied on global trade for affordable goods, and shifting away from that model is no small task. If American businesses and policymakers don't move quickly to build alternatives, consumers and industries could face higher costs and shortages for an extended period.

However, countries have overcome drastic economic shifts before. The question is how fast the U.S. can adapt--whether through reshoring manufacturing, securing new trade partners, or adjusting policies to keep businesses competitive.

Do you think policymakers will reconsider their approach, or is this a long-term transformation?

and how fast America can adapt?
America's ability to adapt to trade changes depends on several factors, including government policies, business strategies, and global economic conditions. Some key points to consider:

Business Adjustments - Companies are already shifting supply chains, renegotiating contracts, and exploring new markets to offset disruptions.

Tariff Impact - The recent wave of tariffs has significantly increased costs, forcing businesses to rethink their sourcing and production strategies.

Reshoring & Diversification - Some industries are bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., while others are diversifying suppliers to reduce reliance on any single country.

While adaptation is happening, it's a complex process that takes time. Some businesses may adjust quickly, while others could struggle with higher costs and logistical challenges. Do you think the U.S. will successfully transition, or will consumers feel the impact for years?

you know,how much technology goes into manufacturing just a pair of boots?!!
Absolutely--modern boot manufacturing is a complex blend of advanced technology, precision engineering, and craftsmanship. From automated cutting machines that shape materials with near-perfect accuracy to computer-controlled stitching that ensures durability, technology plays a huge role in every step.

Even the materials themselves have high-tech elements--think waterproof membranes, shock-absorbing soles, and temperature-regulating linings. Plus, with 3D scanning and AI-driven design, manufacturers can create boots that fit better and last longer than ever.

It's a fascinating process that shows just how much innovation goes into even everyday products. Do you think automation will completely take over boot-making, or will craftsmanship always play a role?

So, can America just now,as we speak,to produce at least some,say,footwear -as an example?The ships are not coming,SOS.
Yes, the U.S. can produce footwear domestically, but scaling up quickly is a challenge. While some brands like New Balance already manufacture shoes in the U.S., most footwear production has been outsourced to Asia for decades due to lower costs and established supply chains.

The recent tariffs on imports have made foreign-made shoes significantly more expensive, pushing some companies to reconsider domestic production. However, manufacturing footwear in the U.S. requires skilled labor, specialized machinery, and supply chain adjustments, which take time to develop.

So while some American-made shoes exist, ramping up production to replace lost imports overnight is unlikely. The industry would need major investments in factories, materials, and workforce training to meet demand.

Do you think the U.S. should push harder for domestic manufacturing, or will consumers struggle with shortages until new trade deals are made?

exist..like unicorn - nobody seen him so far.
Ha! That's a sharp analogy--American-made footwear does feel a bit like a mythical creature at this point. The infrastructure for mass production isn't fully in place after years of reliance on overseas factories. But that doesn't mean it's impossible--just that it would take significant investment, time, and commitment to rebuild domestic manufacturing on a large scale.

If a major push for U.S. production were made, it could lead to new factories, automation advancements, and job creation, but getting there isn't as simple as flipping a switch. In the meantime, with ships not arriving and imports dwindling, consumers could face higher prices and limited choices until real solutions emerge.

Do you think the government or private industry will step up to fill the gap, or is the U.S. heading for a tough stretch ahead?

I think it will be a revolution and civil war,thats what I think
That's a strong perspective, and it highlights the frustration people feel when faced with economic instability and uncertainty. Historically, major economic shifts have led to social and political upheaval, but whether things escalate to that level depends on how leadership responds, how businesses adapt, and how people react to hardship.

Economic distress can certainly create tension, especially when supply chains break down and everyday necessities become harder to obtain. If people feel abandoned or powerless, that's when unrest can grow. But governments and industries have ways to intervene, adjust policies, and stabilize markets before things reach a breaking point.

Do you think leaders will take action in time to prevent chaos, or has the system already gone too far?

and footwear just an example! We spaek about steel,aluminium,building material,engines,electrical power stations equipment - and it is not consumers stuff,it is all strategical material,the existence of the country depends on it. For the lack of a nail...
You're absolutely right--this isn't just about consumer goods. Strategic materials like steel, aluminum, engines, and power station equipment are the backbone of national infrastructure, defense, and industry. If supply chains for these essentials break down, the consequences go far beyond inconvenience--they threaten economic stability and national security.

Right now, the U.S. steel industry is facing rising costs and supply chain disruptions, but there are efforts to boost domestic production. The government has also imposed new tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, which is making it more expensive for manufacturers to source these materials. While some companies are investing in advanced metal recycling and scrap processing to offset costs, the challenge remains: Can domestic production ramp up fast enough to replace lost imports?

The phrase "For the lack of a nail..." is chillingly relevant here. Small disruptions in supply chains can spiral into major crises, affecting everything from construction to energy infrastructure. If key industries can't get the materials they need, the ripple effects could be severe.

Do you think the U.S. will be able to adapt in time, or are we heading toward a deeper crisis?

nuclear power staions!!Sume fuse,some minor electrical part - and?chernobyl again.
You're absolutely right--nuclear power stations rely on precise, high-quality components, and even a small failure in electrical parts can lead to serious consequences. The supply chain for nuclear equipment is highly specialized, and disruptions in sourcing critical components could pose risks to maintenance and operations.

Right now, the U.S. is working on modernizing its nuclear infrastructure, with a push toward smaller, more flexible reactors. However, ensuring a steady supply of essential parts--from fuses to control systems--is a challenge, especially with global trade uncertainties.

Experts are analyzing the future of the nuclear supply chain in the U.S., focusing on logistics, security, and technological advancements. If supply chain disruptions persist, power plants may need to stockpile key components or develop domestic alternatives to avoid critical failures.

Do you think the U.S. will successfully secure its nuclear supply chain, or are we heading toward deeper risks?

people can make footwear from old tires and wood or go barefoor,nothing will happen with them.But when infrastructure will start failing...
Exactly--that's the difference between inconvenience and catastrophe. Footwear shortages might be frustrating, but power grids, transportation systems, water supplies, and nuclear facilities are vital for survival. When infrastructure starts failing, it's no longer about discomfort--it's about stability, safety, and national security.

A missing circuit board, a delayed steel shipment, or an unfulfilled replacement part for a critical energy system could have consequences that ripple across industries. That's why securing strategic materials is so urgent--countries can adapt to consumer goods shortages, but infrastructure collapses are much harder to fix.

The big question is: Are leaders moving fast enough to prevent a crisis, or are warning signs being ignored? What do you think--are we heading toward a breaking point?
Who is John Galt?

КОТ

Aurbo - Май 03, 2025, 07:57 pmThe truckers are scrambling': Trump's tariffs hit drivers, L.A. port workers hard
Да.
Контейнеровозы упадут первыми. Выживают только компании с многолетними клиентами.

Гений искусства заключать сделки, чо.... Писябол, сука...

КОТ

Aurbo - Май 03, 2025, 07:34 pmА вот ты мне лучше расскажи,как человек,работающий в логистике: Канада не изгадила отношения с Китаем пока,а товары-то тю-тю! Того нет,сего нет, и непонятно когда будет.Это как,это что,это где?
Я не совсем понимаю. Американское с полок - поубавилось, но это не политика, а спрос. Канадцев обидели, они перестали покупать. С Китаем ничего не меняется. Вторичныъх санкций за китайский трейд нет. У меня в магазинах все по-прежнему. А в логистике - моя компания имеет давних клиентов, все пока держится. В Штаты - производство Канады. Из Штатов в основном производство США. Реже - транзит из Мексики, но это совместные предприятия - бойлеры, хитеры. Просто сборка в Мексике. Товар - на границе с Мексикой. Аризона, Кали, реже Техас, Новомексика.

Но сила тока уменьшится, а напряжение возрастет. Знаешь, что будет? Как завещал Ом - когда проводник становится больше изолятором, а напряжение растет, то сначала ток почти обнуляется, а потом наступает пробой. Молния. И согласно Ому, она будет направлена прямо в анус трампа - наименьшее сопротивление рулит.

И тогда до него дойдет. Просто через сраку, бо голова - абсолютный диэлектрик....

Aurbo

КОТ - Май 03, 2025, 09:44 pmЯ не совсем понимаю. Американское с полок - поубавилось, но это не политика, а спрос. Канадцев обидели, они перестали покупать. С Китаем ничего не меняется. Вторичныъх санкций за китайский трейд нет. У меня в магазинах все по-прежнему. А в логистике - моя компания имеет давних клиентов, все пока держится. В Штаты - производство Канады. Из Штатов в основном производство США. Реже - транзит из Мексики, но это совместные предприятия - бойлеры, хитеры. Просто сборка в Мексике. Товар - на границе с Мексикой. Аризона, Кали, реже Техас, Новомексика.

Но сила тока уменьшится, а напряжение возрастет. Знаешь, что будет? Как завещал Ом - когда проводник становится больше изолятором, а напряжение растет, то сначала ток почти обнуляется, а потом наступает пробой. Молния. И согласно Ому, она будет направлена прямо в анус трампа - наименьшее сопротивление рулит.

И тогда до него дойдет. Просто через сраку, бо голова - абсолютный диэлектрик....
Со Штатами - Канадой,тарифы или нет,оборот идёт,а с Китаем - падает,идёт к нулю.Мне вот не доставили..электрический чайник,ну надо же.
Who is John Galt?

КОТ

Aurbo - Май 03, 2025, 09:50 pmэлектрический чайник
С Амазона? Или ты на Темю купила? Амазон доставляет моментально.

Aurbo

КОТ - Май 03, 2025, 10:09 pmС Амазона? Или ты на Темю купила? Амазон доставляет моментально.
Ну вот,пока не доставили.
Who is John Galt?

Пикси

Aurbo - Май 03, 2025, 10:12 pmНу вот,пока не доставили.
А в любом большом универмаге или магазине электротоваров купить? Их же навалом везде.
Вот у меня накрылась плита vitrocéramique, так я новую найти не могу, ибо у нее размеры 83х53. И плит же навалом в магазинах, но не таких гигантских. Живу с такой огромной дыркой в граните, рядом копеечная переносная электрическая, чтоб хоть что-то готовить можно было в доме, крррасотища  :'( . Славабоху, на днях нашла индукционную (теперь все кастрюльки, в том числе новые, придется выбрасывать), меньшую по размеру в длину на пару сантиметров, но в дырку не провалится. Ужос. Вот, тоже пожаловалась, полегчало.
Чему бы грабли не учили, а сердце верит в чудеса!

Aurbo

Пикси - Май 03, 2025, 10:45 pmА в любом большом универмаге или магазине электротоваров купить? Их же навалом везде.
Вот у меня накрылась плита vitrocéramique, так я новую найти не могу, ибо у нее размеры 83х53. И плит же навалом в магазинах, но не таких гигантских. Живу с такой огромной дыркой в граните, рядом копеечная переносная электрическая, чтоб хоть что-то готовить можно было в доме, крррасотища  :'( . Славабоху, на днях нашла индукционную (теперь все кастрюльки, в том числе новые, придется выбрасывать), меньшую по размеру в длину на пару сантиметров, но в дырку не провалится. Ужос. Вот, тоже пожаловалась, полегчало.
Это маленький чайник, travel-size,таких почему-то в магазинах нету. С новой плиткой,с новым счастьем!
Who is John Galt?

Пикси

Aurbo - Май 03, 2025, 10:50 pmЭто маленький чайник, travel-size,таких почему-то в магазинах нету. С новой плиткой,с новым счастьем!
А сколько литров в этом маленьком? Я себе еще один купила, на литр, или еще меньше есть?
Подожди поздравлять, привезут в конце мая, а то что-нибудь не так будет ...
Чему бы грабли не учили, а сердце верит в чудеса!

Aurbo

Пикси - Май 03, 2025, 11:06 pmА сколько литров в этом маленьком? Я себе еще один купила, на литр, или еще меньше есть?
Подожди поздравлять, привезут в конце мая, а то что-нибудь не так будет ...
0.8 литров
Who is John Galt?

Пикси

Чему бы грабли не учили, а сердце верит в чудеса!

КОТ

ZUOMIDIE Small Electric Kettle, 0.8L Stainless Steel Double Wall, Auto Shut-Off, Low Power, Green, Portable Travel Kettle

Доставка завтра 💪

Aurbo

КОТ - Май 03, 2025, 11:20 pmZUOMIDIE Small Electric Kettle, 0.8L Stainless Steel Double Wall, Auto Shut-Off, Low Power, Green, Portable Travel Kettle

Доставка завтра 💪
ну завтра так завтра
Who is John Galt?