Yopez ( Йопез :)

в смысле, залатые зубы?!

Микросхемы там всякие. Ну и зубы, конечно.

Lor - Фев. 24, 2024, 01:24 pmМикросхемы там всякие. Ну и зубы, конечно.

А скоко люминия. Это вам не чугуний. Деньги сурьезные

Ukraine to finally receive more long-range weapons after Macron announces allied coalition
Story by Альона Сонько



A new coalition will be created to supply "medium- and long-range missiles and bombs" to Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy seemed to anticipate the decision, as he sounded optimistic about acquiring long-range weapons during a major press conference on Feb. 25 to mark the second anniversary of Russia's brutal full-scale invasion.

"Regarding the ATACMS with a 300 km range, we understand their purpose -- and so does Russia," he said.

"We're working on long-range weapons. I'd summarize by saying I'm optimistic following our partners' recent response."

Macron understands that the long-range weapons could help prevent the need for Western troop deployment in Ukraine.

There is currently no consensus on deployment of the Western troops, Macron said, but it cannot be ruled out.

"Today there is no consensus on the troops deployment, but nothing can be ruled out," he said.

"We will do everything possible so that Russia cannot win this war."

It is key for Europe's security and stability to defeat Russia in Ukraine, he added.

EU leaders should prepare for a possible attack by Russia in the coming years, Macron warned.

Germany reconsiders using nuclear weapons
Story by James Rothwell



Germany is wrestling with the once-unthinkable question of whether it needs nuclear weapons, in the face of a potential Russia-Nato war and concerns that the United States cannot be relied on as a security partner if Donald Trump is re-elected.

Earlier this month, a series of German officials raised the idea of developing an European nuclear deterrent, after Mr Trump's recent remarks encouraging Vladimir Putin to attack Nato states that do not meet spending commitments.

Among them was Christian Lindner, the German finance minister, Friedrich Merz, the CDU opposition leader, and Katarina Barley, a senior member of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's SDP party.

"We should see the latest comments by Donald Trump as a demand to think more about this element of European security within Nato," said Ms Barley.

Britain and France, the only European countries armed with nuclear weapons, extending their cover to Germany has also been discussed.

The idea was quickly shot down by Mr Scholz and Boris Pistorius, the defence minister, as well as Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato secretary-general, who described the discussion as "not helpful".

But the fact that senior German officials, including at least one in government, are even discussing nuclear weapons hints that a major shift could be underway in the country's defence strategy.

Unlike France and Britain, Germany does not possess any nuclear weapons, having renounced them in a 1968 UN non-proliferation treaty. It does allow storage of some US nuclear weapons at an airbase in the country, but the US has control over them.

The debate on Germany's role in a European nuclear deterrent, independent of the US, is at an early stage. One idea which has been discussed is a French and British-led deterrent, though Germany dismissed a similar idea when it was raised by Emmanuel Macron in 2020.

"The strategic nuclear forces of France and Great Britain are already making a contribution to the security of our alliance," Mr Lindner argued earlier this month.

He added: "The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has made various offers of co-operation. We should understand Donald Trump's recent statements as a call to further rethink this element of European security under the umbrella of Nato."

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Maximilian Terhalle, a German security expert, who has long campaigned for reform on nuclear weapons, said it was time for Berlin to alter its stance in the face of Putin's warmongering in Europe.

Mr Terhalle said: "You can have 15 divisions and modern battle tanks, but if you don't have a nuclear deterrent and you're facing an enemy who not only has one but is also willing to threaten you with it, then these divisions won't do any good."

He has previously suggested that Germans consider buying nuclear weapons "off the shelf" because of the risk that Putin could attack Nato in as little as two years.

Ukraine Takes City in Donetsk, Eliminates Over 1,000 Russian Troops: Kyiv
Story by Aila Slisco



The Ukrainian military claims to have taken control of a city in the embattled Donetsk region on the same day that it purportedly eliminated more than 1,000 Russian troops from the battlefield.

Maksym Zhorin, deputy commander of Ukraine's Third Assault Brigade, said in a Telegram post on Wednesday that Russian forces had been pushed out of Krasnohorivka, a city on the western outskirts of the region's eponymous capital, as part of a "counterattacking" effort in response to a series of recent setbacks.

"The third assault unit knocked out the occupiers from Krasnohorivka in Donetsk region!" the brigade wrote in a separate Telegram post. "The Russians refused to surrender and were liquidated in the houses they occupied. As of now, Krasnohorivka is under the control of Ukrainian troops!"

The purported capturing of the city follows Ukraine's February 17 loss of Avdiivka, a city about 18 miles to the northeast of Krasnohorivka, which occurred after months of fighting. Ukraine also retreated from two other villages near Avdiivka earlier this week.

The Third Assault Brigade claimed that Russian forces suffered at least 100 casualties, including deaths and service ending-injuries, during the capturing of Krasnohorivka.

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported in a post to Facebook on Wednesday that Russia had a total of 1,060 casualties on the same day, while suffering equipment losses that included 20 artillery systems and 14 tanks.

Newsweek reached out for comment to the Russian Ministry of Defense via email on Wednesday night.

Ukraine claims that Russia has lost a total of 412,610 military personnel since the invasion began on February 24, 2022, alongside 6,570 tanks, 342 aircraft, 25 warships, 10,029 artillery systems and 7,753 drones. Newsweek has not independently verified any of Ukraine's war claims.

Kyiv managed to spark the "ire" of Russian military bloggers and "concerns about Ukraine's use of HIMARS systems" after an attack on a Russian military awards ceremony in the Donetsk settlement of Olenivka on Monday night, according to a report published on Wednesday by U.S.-based think tank Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

At least 19 Russian personnel were purportedly killed in the strike, including a deputy brigade commander, a captain and a major. According to the think tank, pro-Moscow bloggers have become "increasingly concerned that Ukrainian forces are able to exploit poor Russian operational security practices."

Regardless of the taking of Krasnohorivka and casualties inflicted on Russian forces, there is little doubt that Moscow has gained the upper hand in the war in recent weeks, especially in the Donetsk region.

Zev Faintuch, senior intelligence analyst at security firm Global Guardian, previously told Newsweek that the situation in Donetsk shows that Ukraine is "both outmanned and outgunned along the front" and "needs to adopt an active defense strategy."

Ukraine's recent difficulties on the battlefield were preceded by the flow of foreign military aid slowing to a trickle at the beginning of the year. Around $60 billion in additional U.S. aid remains stalled in Congress amid a series of partisan disputes that may be especially difficult to resolve during an election year.

Skylight - Фев. 28, 2024, 01:01 pmGermany reconsiders using nuclear weapons
Story by James Rothwell



Germany is wrestling with the once-unthinkable question of whether it needs nuclear weapons, in the face of a potential Russia-Nato war and concerns that the United States cannot be relied on as a security partner if Donald Trump is re-elected.

Earlier this month, a series of German officials raised the idea of developing an European nuclear deterrent, after Mr Trump's recent remarks encouraging Vladimir Putin to attack Nato states that do not meet spending commitments.

Among them was Christian Lindner, the German finance minister, Friedrich Merz, the CDU opposition leader, and Katarina Barley, a senior member of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's SDP party.

"We should see the latest comments by Donald Trump as a demand to think more about this element of European security within Nato," said Ms Barley.

Britain and France, the only European countries armed with nuclear weapons, extending their cover to Germany has also been discussed.

The idea was quickly shot down by Mr Scholz and Boris Pistorius, the defence minister, as well as Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato secretary-general, who described the discussion as "not helpful".

But the fact that senior German officials, including at least one in government, are even discussing nuclear weapons hints that a major shift could be underway in the country's defence strategy.

Unlike France and Britain, Germany does not possess any nuclear weapons, having renounced them in a 1968 UN non-proliferation treaty. It does allow storage of some US nuclear weapons at an airbase in the country, but the US has control over them.

The debate on Germany's role in a European nuclear deterrent, independent of the US, is at an early stage. One idea which has been discussed is a French and British-led deterrent, though Germany dismissed a similar idea when it was raised by Emmanuel Macron in 2020.

"The strategic nuclear forces of France and Great Britain are already making a contribution to the security of our alliance," Mr Lindner argued earlier this month.

He added: "The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has made various offers of co-operation. We should understand Donald Trump's recent statements as a call to further rethink this element of European security under the umbrella of s.

короче, я думаю было так

вован помог трампику избраться под обещание трампа развалить нато. восемь лет достаточный срок должен был быть.
с условием. что путин никуда не лезет пока трамп в офисе

но случилась неувязочка, трампа не переизбрали

поэтому путин начал наспех эту войну и все у них пошло через жопу. через жопу может и так бы пошло. но за шесть лет была б посерьёзнее подготовка

ciao1 - Фев. 29, 2024, 08:28 amпоэтому путин начал наспех эту войну и все у них пошло через жопу. через жопу может и так бы пошло. но за шесть лет была б посерьёзнее подготовка

А что они за последние 300 лет сделали не через жопу?

Это рашн традишн. Всё делать через жопу. Так что временной фактор можно откинуть, как малозначительный.

мля, это серьёзныя конспираси сиори, про вована с дональдом. тут нужна помощь целой бригады венских врачей, риали

главно дело, за четыре года ничего не слУчилось с натой, даже совсем ничего. ну, стали чуть больше денег в общак нести, но это ж нормально?

но в Украину вован не лез. хоть ты што говори, а не лез

Луиджи - Фев. 29, 2024, 12:39 pmмля, это серьёзныя конспираси сиори, про вована с дональдом. тут нужна помощь целой бригады венских врачей, риали

главно дело, за четыре года ничего не слУчилось с натой, даже совсем ничего. ну, стали чуть больше денег в общак нести, но это ж нормально?

но в Украину вован не лез. хоть ты што говори, а не лез

Ну а чо например Дональд вооружил до зубов 300 тыс, афганской армии, шоп выводить аттуда американцев а те засчисчалися ат талибана.
Разве ему разведка не доложила шо та армия нибудет ваевать, а разбежится па домам?

От есле бы он 4 года вооружал Украину, тадаб оружие не пропало, ну украли/продали бы 15% но не более того.

Пуйло проста ссыкливое как шакал, думал шо Трампушу Болтон убедит напасть на Иран, вот тадаб и Пу засал идти на Украину и хамас на Израиль.

Трамп политик нулевой, он просто свои манипуляции со строительством небоскребов в городах масштабировал в большую политику, а там все совсем нитак...

Skylight - Фев. 29, 2024, 12:52 pmТрамп политик нулевой, он просто свои манипуляции со строительством небоскребов в городах масштабировал в большую политику, а там все совсем нитак...

не, ну серцем то я понимаю, што вы в большой политеке сильней и понятливей чем трамп, но ум отказываеца  это пОнять

умом расеню нипанять
у ней асобенная стать
ее аршином нипамерять
в расеню мона тока верить

и вымня полное ее
замять запазуху нисмох
а смох ее такута мать
за памидоры падержать

страна мая
я сын тваих берес
украл шо смох
не все тока донес

P.S.Хлавно шо Трампуша всем гаварит зачем мол вы талибану мое оружие атдале.
Отжиж брехло.

Луиджи - Фев. 29, 2024, 12:39 pm...но в Украину вован не лез. хоть ты што говори, а не лез

Ще один настамнет. С такою риторикою тільки нахуй.

Луиджи - Фев. 29, 2024, 12:39 pmно в Украину вован не лез. хоть ты што говори, а не лез

А не в 14 ли году он туда залез? Невероятно трудно залезть второй раз туда где ты уже есть, верно?

xxdevil - Фев. 29, 2024, 06:52 pmА не в 14 ли году он туда залез? Невероятно трудно залезть второй раз туда где ты уже есть, верно?

но это было при обаме
а железная воля президента трампа ограничила  путинскую агрессию